autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Accusump experience anyone?...

To: <SlyFoxRc@aol.com>, <JasonK@neversoft.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Accusump experience anyone?...
From: "Alex Quirk" <vquirk@penn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:59:53 -0500
Tracy Sanberg replied:

> Many years of good experience with Accusump.  When rebuilding
> after two seasons the bearings look new and the crank has never
> been damaged.  This has been in a high horsepower LT-1 Chevy
> smallblock ESP car.

> Advantages are many but one is that you open the valve prior to
> startup and the engine is pressurized with oil so that you never
> have a dry start situation.  The reserve tank holds an additional 3
> Quarts of oil and feeds it into the engine only when the pressure
> drops below the stored pressure in the tank (normal engine
> pressure).  This allows the oil pressure to be maintained in
> high G cornering etc. when the oil in the pan can move away
> from the pickup.  Accusumps have rightly been referred to as a
> inexpensive dry sump. They do a great job of protecting the
> engine.

> Tracy Sandberg
> Sly Fox Racing
> P.S. I would bet the 3 Quart version with either the electric solenoid
> valve or the manual valve, not the smaller version.

it depends on the sustained 'G' loading and the size and volume of the
engine oil pump...'more' capacity <3 qts.> gives 'longer' duration of
protection....If the vehicle is capable of high enough G loading in a
'sustained skid pad condition' to uncover the pickup even the 3 qt. Accusump
could run 'dry'...but unlikely...lots of oil up inside the valve
train......and against the side of the oil pan.....they are ALWAYS a GOOD
idea....in the absence of a dry sump...

Alex Quirk TLS#2


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>