autox
[Top] [All Lists]

FW: STU rules

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: FW: STU rules
From: "Thompson, Adrian (A.L.)" <athomps9@visteon.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 12:50:42 -0400
This didn't seem to post first time.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thompson, Adrian (A.L.) 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 11:07 AM
> To:   'autox@autox.team.net'
> Subject:      STU rules
> 
> Having seen Dennis Grant this weekend I had a look at the proposed STU
> rules at his suggestion. Quick disclaimer.  I'm relatively new to the list
> and have been away from Solo for a couple of years, so I don't know what
> discussion has gone on before, also I don't want to upset anyone but here
> are my thoughts.  While I think the basic idea is nice, I also think it's
> unworkable.  You could end up with some incredibly expensive vehicles that
> would make some D and E Mod's look tame!  For example, in the five minuets
> since I read the rules how's this combo that by my reading is legal.
> 
> Start with and early Fox bodied 4 cyl Mustang, no options.  These cars
> were light, I'm guessing you could get one down to 2500lb's.  Now for the
> Body we could get commercially available carbon fiber hood, fenders, facia
> etc that would reduce the weight further and allow for the tires we're
> about to fit.  Also because of the 93 Cobra R you can loose the back seat
> which is ST legal (it may no longer be a 4 setae but it did start that
> way)
> 
> Suspension, the only limit is using the stock pick-ups.  Well there are
> companies out there who do SLA front and fully independent rear
> suspensions that use all the stock Fox Pick up's.
> 
> Engine, any block from the same manufacturer that meet's the capacity
> limit.  How about the European Escort/Sierra Cosworth 2.0L turbo motor.
> In Europe plenty of people are taking these to 2.5L with billet steel
> rods, crank etc.  Rework the turbo system, or even better a new twin turbo
> with two small units to keep lag down.  500BHP is only a phone call and a
> big credit card away for the stock engine.
> 
> With the anything goes on the body bracing you can easily overcome the
> soggy noodle reputation of the Fox platform.  Wow, we've suddenly got a
> $50,000 car that would be no fun on the street and blow away your VTEC
> engined Civic.
> 
> OR another one, start with an old no option  Porsche 924, drop in a late
> 968 Engine, and 944 Turbo S suspension/running gear.  Lot's of people in
> Europe are Turboing that engine.  I don't even want to think about the
> possibilities of a third gen RX7 twin turbo engine, unlimited tuning in
> any one of the old small LIGHT 4 seat sedans that Mazda turned out!!!!
> The possibilities are endless and I could go on for ever. 
> 
> I realize that a lot of people have put a lot of time and effort into
> these rules.  But as written I don't think that they would help bring new
> people into the class.  The cars that people are trying to attract would
> be just as outclassed as if they were running in Prepared or Mod.  Just my
> quick thoughts, I'm not trying to upset people.  
> 
> Adrian Thompson
> 2002 Panther Suspension Engineer
> Visteon Chassis Systems
> Phone:       313 322 6544
> Cell phone: 313 418 5943
> Fax:           313 390 4714
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>