Are you trying to say no member of the SEB, SCAC (or PAC)
has never had ulterior motives when casting a vote, or when
introducing an issue ?? That they are above using their "clout"
to make something happen, or influence others, for their own
individual benefit?
Wanna bet - - -?? These ain't saints that are in power, at least
some of them are incapable of walking on water.
BTW, if you think the SCCA isn't VERY political, if you think
that it is VERY democratic, then tell me - - when is the last time
the general membership voted on their own leadership??
They don't - - these "officials" appoint each other. And their
committees. If that ain't the "Good Ole Boy" way of doing things,
what is it, oh ye of blind faith??
G
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick Washburn <washburn@dwave.net> wrote:
> There's a great idea, let's take it out on the dues paying membership!
> I sense that you were just putting this out as a fun "what if", but the
> underlying message is that the "SCCA" will class cars in Solo for
> political reasons. Even though you were kidding (?), I think it is
> important for folks to know that this is not how things work. I sure
> hope that my belief in our fellow competitors who make up the SEB,
> SCAC,
> ..., who really do the classing, is not misguided.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|