autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFI: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write

To: Jon Rush <jonathan.rush@sdrc.com>
Subject: Re: RFI: First draft of my proposed C&C re-write
From: Gail/Sid deLeon <deleon@gs.verio.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 17:12:29 -0500
How many #'s in one materially ?
Sid

Jon Rush wrote:

> The portion of the first sentence, "modifications which have no effect
> on performance and/or handling and do not materially reduce the weight
> of the car are permitted." Still doesn't capture what you are looking
> for. I'll give you an example that was kicked around on a Mustang list a
> while back.
>
> You can buy custom made synthetic granite speaker enclosures designed to
> reduce unwanted resonance. You could make a subwoofer enclosure out of
> the granite and bolt it in the hatch area of the Mustang. 300 pounds of
> ballast right where you need it on a Pony. And a perfectly legitimate
> purpose from a C&C standpoint. Those unwanted resonance are a real
> affront to the audiophile ear. Based on the above sentence, you would
> have to banish the car, as there is a definite improvement in
> performance by adding this C&C item.
>
> But what about the kid with the tin ear who bolts a 30 pound subwoofer
> in his hatch? It is still a performance improvement, just to a much
> lesser degree. I suspect most people would allow this car in under the
> C&C rule you just proposed. So what we are really talking about is the
> degree of performance change. Any weight added has an effect on
> performance and handling, some of it beneficial. Where do you draw the
> line?
>
> I say just drop the words "have no effect on performance and/or handling
> and" and live with the creative ballasting that someone can perform by
> adding C&C items.
>
> So the first sentence should read:
>
> Accessories, gauges, indicators, lights and other appearance,
> comfort and convenience modifications which do not materially reduce the
> weight of the car are permitted.
>
> I like what you've done with the rest.
>
> Jon Rush
>
> Arthur Emerson wrote:
> > Here's my proposed changes for the 2001 book:
> >
> > 13.2 Bodywork
> >
> >    A.  Accessories, gauges, indicators, lights and other appearance,
> >        comfort and convenience modifications which have no effect on
> >        performance and/or handling and do not materially reduce the
> >        weight of the car are permitted.  Examples of these
> >        modifications include the addition of fog lights, pin striping,
> >        stereo equipment, cupholders, and the installation of air
> >        conditioning on a car not originally equipped with it. This
> >        does not allow for changes of any kind to vehicle controls
> >        used while driving on a Solo-II course, including shifter
> >        levers and knobs, pedal covers, driver's seat, or steering
> >        wheel, unless specifically permitted by another paragraph of
> >        section 13.
> >
> >        Control modifications which allow a disabled driver to
> >        operate the vehicle will be permitted, provided that
> >        the disabled driver is competing in the event, they are
> >        appropriate for safe use in a Solo-II event, and are approved
> >        by both the state's vehicle safety inspection program and
> >        the event safety steward.  [How about 2-driver cars,
> >        where only one is disabled???]
> >
> >    K.  Any item that is listed in the vehicle owner's manual as
> >        being removable, such as cargo covers in hatchbacks, hub
> >        caps, fender skirts, targa and t-tops, may be removed.
> >        Any interior item which cannot be held _safely_ in place
> >        by factory fasteners may be removed.
> >
> > [New paragraphs]
> >
> >    L.  All seats must be original and un-modified.
> >        Cushions may be used for the purpose of..... [Grab the
> >        first three sentences from "SEAT PADDING" on page 247
> >        of Appendix G.]
> >
> >    M.  Delayed shutdown devices such as the "Turbo Timer", which
> >        perform no function while the car is in motion, are permitted.
> >
> >    N.  The installation of an additional mirror (e.g. a "Wink")
> >        is permitted, provided that the original mirror is not
> >        removed.
> >
> >    O.  [This spot reserved for Accusumps in stock class, which
> >        I've been meaning to submit but haven't yet.]
> >
> > Let the whining begin..... :-)
> >
> > -Arthur ("Still don't see paint as being required anywhere" edition.)
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>