ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SM PAX (was: 02 Pax)

To: Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net
Subject: Re: SM PAX (was: 02 Pax)
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:02:05 EST
In a message dated 11/18/01 11:05:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net writes:


> The take I've heard on this on the SM list (from a few, not all) is that
> it's so hard to set up these highly prepared cars that it's unreasonable
> to expect them to remain as fast as, say, their SP equivalents for several
> years.
> 
> I think that reasoning is total crap and that they are PAXing the drivers,
> not the cars.  It certainly can be argued that is what happens in other
> classes as well, but I still don't think it's a good thing, and SM is a
> particularly egregious example of it.
> 
I'm in absolute agreement!

Charlie

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>