datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: economics of stroker parts

To: Stan Chernoff <az589@lafn.org>
Subject: Re: economics of stroker parts
From: Guy & Pamela Pepoy <gppepoy@cybertrails.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:25:25 -0700
Stan,
Thank you.  Well said.
Guy
67.5 Stroker in progress
Tempe, AZ

Stan Chernoff wrote:

>Pistons made in China and expected to operate at 2000 rpm in engines with
>an 8:1, or lower, compression ratio are not necessarily designed for
>operation at 6000+ rpm with 10:1 compression ratios.  There is more to
>consider than looks.  Material selection, casting density and autothermic
>strut design along with other factors must be considered when making or
>selecting performance pistons.  The Nissan flat top pistons made for the
>U-20 will take the kinds of stresses that will be generated by a stroker R
>type engine or the U type.
>
>People in the manufacturing business must be cost competitive and focus on
>the market that is buying their products and on the application.  Good
>business people make products that meet their customers requirements but
>not exceed them to a ridiculous degree.  Economies of scale are significant
>in product cost especially when the product design is focused on the end
>use requirements.  Even Nissan designed components for their specific use.
>An example is the 3-main crankshaft for the H-19 engine since some were
>castings and some were steel forgings depending on their application.  The
>steel forgings were made for the higher performance applications and can
>make a 3-main R engine into one with the same displacement as a U-20
>(Stroker).  Compare an H-20 crank to a 
>U-20 crank and you will see many differences that have an effect on their
>respective performance.  You may also note that the U-20 has an harmonic
>balancer, that the R and H engines lack, that was not put there to waste
>money.
>
>Dished or recess top pistons are not performance oriented.  Engine
>performance is somewhat proportionally related to compression ratio.  The
>compression developed by flat top U-20 pistons in an R block with a U-20 or
>H-20 crankshaft is not excessive and affords much better performance than
>the lower compression dished forklift ones as long as the cylinder head is
>not cut excessively.  
>
>My R engine with a U-20 crank, rods and pistons and a cyl head cut at least
>.100" made it to and from Shasta in the 110+ deg F temperatures without any
>cooling or pinging problems while using a 4 row high efficiency radiator
>core and the original 4 blade steel fan.  It got a little over 20 mpg for
>fuel consumption with Solex carbs.  
>
>If you are lucky you get what you pay for.  Cheap isn't always the best.
>
>Stan
>========
>
>At 07:40 PM 8/27/02 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>For a good example of your theory see definition of Chevy Small Block.
>>Manley valves which cost me 20.50 are about $8 each. Pistons? Except for
>>forged or HP units are ridiculously cheap and made by respected
>>manufacturers.
>>
>>It makes me sick looking through a Summit catalog. Look at the prices of
>>Mopar or Ford engine parts and they cost more.
>>
>>BTW, the forklift parts are made for industrial use and are more often than
>>not, overbuilt for reliability. People use the equipment to make money can't
>>afford frequent breakdowns.
>>
>>Mike
>>
>
>///  datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
>///  Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or go to
>///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
>///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
>///  Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net

///  datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>