fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Accusump

To: Jim Hill <Jim_Hill@chsra.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: Accusump
From: bwarner@mediaone.net
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 08:54:37 -0400
Jim Hill wrote:
> 
> Bob Lang wrote:
> 
> > With respect to the Accusump and dry sump systems, are they really
> > necessary if you have baffles??? I'm talking about autocross and possibly
> > later on some road course action (like time trialing or high speed
> > "touring" with BMWCCA).
> 
> My understanding is that one of the chief advantages of the Accusump (which,
> I hasten to add, I do NOT have on my TR6 - yet) is that it retains a supply
> of oil under pressure when the engine is not running - and is thus able to
> provide an immediate supply of pressurized oil when the engine is started,
> avoiding those first few seconds when the bearing surfaces are spinning w/o
> a supply of oil under pressure.
> 
> Baffles, of course, supply no such protection - nor do they increase the
> volume of oil in circulation as an Accusump does.
> 
> Jim Hill
> Madison WI
The Group 44 car had an ACCUSUMP when I bought it and we use it
primarily for pre-oiling.  I had one in my old B-210 (the ex-Bob Sharp
car) also.  I feel that they are necessary on a standard sump race
engine.  Bill Warner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>