fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [FOT] Mallory question

To: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Subject: Re: [FOT] Mallory question
From: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:08:57 -0700
Oops, I meant the points are connected in parallel.
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Bill Babcock wrote:

> If you are going to try to use dwell to set the individual points  
> then yes, you have to block the other set open. The engine won't  
> run for shit when you block open the opening points. The entire  
> reason for having dual points is that the dwell (the number of  
> degrees that the electricity is flowing into the coil) is much  
> longer--this gives the coil longer to saturate and ensures you get  
> a good spark even at higher RPM. You don't really want to set the  
> points that way though. The combined dwell (the period from when  
> the closing point closes until the opening point opens) should be  
> from 70 to 75 degrees, and that's not a bad quick check to ensure  
> your points are in the ballpark.
>
> Set your points at .020" and make sure your timing is fine, then  
> check combined dwell.
>
> One thing to pay attention to with newer Mallory points is the wear  
> of the rubbing block. They seem to have gone to a much stiffer  
> spring--I don't know why. If you don't keep the cam lubed and/or  
> don't check every now and then you'll find the point gap closes up.  
> Dwell is a nice quick check for problems.
>
> Remember that the closing points don't do anything to timing--just  
> the opening points. The way these things work is that the points  
> are connected in series, the "closing" points open first, but  
> nothing happens because the opening points are still closed. then  
> the cam reaches the opening points and electricity is cut off to  
> the coil. The magnetic field collapses and you get a spark. A tiny  
> bit of rotation later the closing point closes and electricity  
> flows to the coil again, much sooner than the opening point could  
> restore power without a very sharp cam ramp and hard springs. then  
> the opening point closes and nothing happens.
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 1:28 PM, William G Rosenbach wrote:
>
>> On a dual point, aren't you supposed to read dwell on each set
>> individually and get an average of the two?
>> Bill
>>
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:21:30 -0500 "Jack W. Drews"  
>> <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
>> writes:
>>> I'm installing a Mallory Dual Point to replace the ten year old  
>>> brain
>>>
>>> box that really didn't have much brains anyway.
>>>
>>> Question regarding points setting -- they don't give a gap but they
>>>
>>> do give a dwell. On my distributor, with the points set at .015 from
>>>
>>> the factory, the dwell reads 50. Is my dwell meter goofy or should I
>>>
>>> really reduce the points gap that much?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> uncle jack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> No Virus Found In This Message
>>> Scanned at barracuda.geneseo.net
>>>
>>>
>>> ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
>>> ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
>> ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
>
> ===  Help keep Team.Net on the air
> ===     http://www.team.net/donate.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>