fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [FOT] another tow vehicle possibility

To: "'Ken Gano, home'" <triumphs@consolidated.net>,
Subject: RE: [FOT] another tow vehicle possibility
From: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:17:53 -0700
Nice. I might have to rethink my '49.  That would look great with an
airstream behind it. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net] On Behalf
Of Ken Gano, home
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:29 PM
To: TeriAnn Wakeman; Friends of Triumph
Subject: [FOT] another tow vehicle possibility

Maybe something like this??

http://www.countryclassiccars.com/Pics/3571_1.jpg

I saw this in person the last time I was over that way.  It really is a neat
set up.  As I recall they used a front clip from a very heavy duty front
wheel drive van and a long "car hauler" trailer for the rear.

kg


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of
TeriAnn Wakeman
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:23 AM
To: Friends of Triumph
Subject: Re: [FOT] Computer public service announcement (no TR content)

Tony Drews wrote:
> The department of homeland security is requesting that everyone 
> running windows 2000, windows XP and windows 2003 server install the 
> latest round of windows updates from Microsoft.  If you don't have 
> automatic updates turned on, you can get them by going to 
> http://update.microsoft.com .

And if you are running Mac OS X you just chuckle again.

So far no one has mentioned swapping a long pickup bed for a flat bed
sitting on the frame below the tops of the rear wheels and ramps. Is there
any reason why this is not a reasonable option?  Just eliminate the trailer
altogether?

TeriAnn




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.1/421 - Release Date: 8/16/2006





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>