fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] chaseCam no lbc

To: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Fot] chaseCam no lbc
From: Bill Babcock <billbab@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:44:41 -0700
Amen. You need to edit video anyway so that someone else will want to  
watch it. sitting through a 30 minute race as raw footage is boring  
for everyone but the driver. Even a seven minute lap of the ring gets  
a little long for most people. I've found I can make a decent race  
video by concentrating on having a total length of three minutes. A  
better video is an entire event, including some non-track stuff, about  
five minutes long. You have to add titles to explain the sections and  
perhaps some voiceover. The downside is that producing an edited video  
five minutes long from an hour of raw video takes two or three hours  
of concentrated work. Figure twice the editing time per raw footage  
time. And that's if you're pretty good at it, have a good idea where  
the good stuff is, and understand the software. Inevitably you'll find  
that you've accidentally cut something you wanted to keep.

The best way to do it is find some kid that likes playing with video  
editing and have them do it. I need to find another one, my video geek  
moved. Don't pay them, at least not in money. An occasional meal is  
good.
On Jul 21, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Robert Lang wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Compressing video is pretty tough. The most efficient compression
> tecniques are proprietary (like DivX) so you need a viewer that has
> "codec" to read the compressed file. The other factor is the final  
> video
> output size (in pixels), smaller vidZ (like 320x240) can compress to
> fairly small files (megabytes as opposed to hundreds of megabyes.)
>
> But to get vidz small enough to e-mail, you'll have to edit out  
> stuff to
> get the actual video as short as possible, then reduce the size and  
> see
> whatcha get.
>
> I haven't used any of the PC software for video at this point, but I  
> have
> spent quite a while with vidz on one of my Macs. On the Mac, it's
> drop-dead simple to take the video file, edit it and export it at
> different formats (sizes) and compression. The default seem to favor
> either the web (small viewable size and highly compressed) or DVD  
> output
> which can make pretty big files (10gb / hour or bigger).
>
> I have a couple of vidz on utube that I did on my Mac. The process  
> took
> about 20 minutes including the upload to utube.
>
> So, the key is in the size and the length of the video. Worry about  
> the
> compression after that (when you "export" the video. Quality video  
> makes
> HUGE files.
>
> rml
> p.s. on a side note, I was chatting with another NER member (Richard
> Hunter, an IT Honda driver) about Chase Cam and he reported problems  
> with
> his setup, but his seemed to be related to the fact that he got the  
> video
> overlay "box" so he can shoot ahead and point a camera at himself (or
> behind the car or whatever) - he keeps getting corrupted files. But  
> the
> interesting comment was that "there's no documentation and the support
> organization is pretty thin" (my words). Chase Cam is a good  
> product, but
> the world of video on computer is fairly complex.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Lang              NER/SCCA                 |  This space for rent
> Solo Chair 2008       TR6 40 F Prepared        |  Triumph!
> Voice:781-438-2568    FAX: 617-258-9535        |  Cell: 339-927-4489
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>

Bill Babcock
Babcock & Jenkins
Billb@bnj.com
503.936.7660
www.bnj.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html

Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>