That's an interesting perspective, and certainly logical. The only
thing that doesn't bear up in my experience (which is certainly
subjective, and unsupported by statistics available to me) is that the
majority of nasty accidents seem to happen in the mid pack at vintage
races. And Vintage cars generally don't have anything leading edge in
their safety equipment. A mild steel rollcage constructed like those
of the late 60's, shoulder belts, fire suit, a good helmet and maybe a
HANs device. I'm sure you don't think that's anything like what saves
lives in F1, or Indycars, or Nascar, or drag racing, or virtually any
modern race car.
Sure, the stuff isn't cheap, but by and large it's a long-term
investment. Anyone that thinks this fairly minimal level of protection
makes them invulnerable has a few screws loose to begin with. Or has
never been in a serious racing accident in a vintage car and come away
lucky--because that's really all it is. Nothing in my car or on my
body saved me from being killed by that Corvette that T-boned me at
Watkins Glen. Just luck. Didn't hit the wall until most of the speed
had been scrubbed off. Didn't roll over while he was pushing me
sideways. Just luck.
The "keeps new people away from the sport" argument plays equally well
with not letting people race a clapped out H prod rabbit in Vintage. I
don't think the idea of vintage racing is to have the cheapest entry
point available in racing. I think that's karts.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:07 AM, William G Rosenbach wrote:
>>>> Henry Morrison wrote:
> I think that when you get a guy in a car with all the safety equipment
> on, he
> thinks he's bulletproof and will probably take chances not taken by
> the
> guy
> who is perhaps racing with a lap belt as his only safety device.
>
> I tend to agree with Henry. It was pointed out in, I believe a PBS
> program on automotive safety; if you take two identical cars, give
> one to
> a person who is told "anything you do in this car, no matter how
> minor,
> will kill or seriously injure you"; and the other car to a person
> that is
> told that "no matter what you do in this car, the safety systems will
> protect you from any injury in any situation"; those two cars will
> not be
> operated in the same fashion.
>
> In the real racing world, where a driver is paid to operate a
> vehicle on
> the razor's edge at all times, where there is something tangible to
> someone 'on-the-line' at all times; there are no safety equipment
> standards that are too much. In Vintage Racing, even though anything
> that
> can happen, could happen, there is nothing truly 'on-the-line', we are
> there for fun, not glory & prizes; and should be able to exercise
> restraint and good judgement. Still, there are those who cannot do
> that.
> They are the folks who are certain that they and their car can clip
> the
> apex of the hairpin flat in fourth having never lifted or braked. They
> know who they are and should make the investment. Equally important is
> that others know who the crazies are, so as to stay out of their
> way, and
> not to get wound up with them. If we keep heading for the completely
> safe
> world, we will soon be driving in 'Bear Proof Suits'.
> http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=bear+proof+suit&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&co
> p=mss&ei=UTF-8
>
> Mandating greater costs to racers keeps new people away from the
> sport,
> and trying to keep up all the mandates can eat up some racers' annual
> budget quickly, keeping them off track. A couple of years of paying
> not
> to race, and they are gone.
>
> Eat right, exercise, die anyway.
> Bill
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.fot-racing.com
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|