fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Manifold needed

To: "BillDentin@aol.com" <BillDentin@aol.com>, "jeffreykelley@charter.net" <jeffreykelley@charter.net>, "timmurph@fastbytes.com" <timmurph@fastbytes.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Manifold needed
From: EDWARD BARNARD <edwardbarnard@prodigy.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Tzvm4k/BSraHEZCZpUhFR5pZzu+kQnXnWsycJMSCkk80HkpPumZqn2ugk1HjS/ns7J1gHxRJcimFq+nnDb4y1YIG16Ej+Ky7N6wOeZW5ByO9cf+xFDVO960GVSosVQatTzSGuaWhFfbBJSCbyjhRMsmIPAu+3lWN2BdFXn8Dac8= ; DPeG8XbSx0bu3MYg4Civh5FUX9IrgJqFr2YGL9o.DhHNBqOEqoFFaFJp25_. gSyY347zDBgfMskQ4HQxVmIakeZTspTtaSWsBY0dcj5HfnrnXSKKSuI8Frqt TKbZLtofNXqi1v9h0gBr3T1yptkTaUCB8MzmtadTGQ65NUgBOvHhDlHwCqof P1S0xpw.XkbLiFNF87Zy6zpV0f35iclxk3tBb4p2ffgGQqq7XFJixHznlyGH JaQKPR7QFksyw70ulnbuYuzwCP25lS3qQd0Nbx2SXPFX_AFrSmtrV8KaZUNq a2MNxg5IUZgvykn_uCHecLFWaRCD.3b5FOS7eNQOU79Ik.Gef9bp9.mwRb5x Z19y7CkbyHI7bMIXlPWtmRZ9DL_qh6YKPkEpuFgTJf1Iwwl0u0y06kQMhgh7 cl3_pRjpQYXlCSOC7nijLT7jmEI.WRbzLzVMqo_AvErRiF4jPUzszleMHz4n mTfHiVAcgt5dyKvpL5uGl_.7GhviqydRx7l_sJLakpbjiF5eqtFbwbGMt3A5 NHWVeo8lEqWBSW7SARnIPDQB_eHa4qe2rUgHb73xlxDLHGfZJ83I9ADeVJdB wDmWCixaPt7WcFgxanIcDLVNDT2O8292O3Lck5c8.QB0e.o..5F9qAdzc8j1 Xm18t.DUgsbJq06RejoQ-
References: <c73e2.14574876.3f0f0f3a@aol.com>
Bill  and everyone that has offered to help:
The  manifold I am referring to
as a low port manifold uses, as Jeff Kelly pointed out,  the H4 SU with the
two mounting bolts. Bill, you called it the barbaric looking, crude one. The
H4 model was used up to TS8996L There was suppose to be a low port model that
used H6's, but it was only used from TS8997 to TS9349 and therefore is a much
rarer model. Another identifying point would be that the intake and exhaust
ports are in a nearly straight line, where as the high port heads have the
intakes in a visibly higher, and the carbs are angled upward where I believe
the low port manifold has them horizontal. I must admit, I have only seen a
couple of low port head/manifolds.
With all the responses I'm hoping one will
be scared up. This is one great group and proof the so much can be done in
numbers. Long live the FOT!
Thanks in advance - Ed  
 
________________________________
 From: "BillDentin@aol.com"
<BillDentin@aol.com>
To: jeffreykelley@charter.net; timmurph@fastbytes.com
Cc: fot@autox.team.net 
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:25 PM
Subject: Re:
[Fot] Manifold needed
  

In a message dated 07/10/2013 2:14:15 PM Central
Daylight Time, 
jeffreykelley@charter.net writes:


> If you need a picture I
have an early TR2 with a low port head. The 
> biggest difference is that the
H4 SU's use a two (2) bolt flange to 
> mount not four (4).
> 
> 

There's a
pretty clear picture of all three in the MOSS catalogue.  I am 
looking at the
Manifolds Page (page 15)_ in the Spring/Summer 2010 TRIUMPH 
TR2-4 book, but
its the same picture that always appears in their TR2-4 
catalogues.

Bill
Dentinger
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com/

Archive:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/edwardbarnard@prodigy.net
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>