fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] TR6 Harmonic Dampener

To: Robert Lang <robertlangtr6@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR6 Harmonic Dampener
From: "JS Performance Motoring, LLC via Fot" <fot@autox.team.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:13:35 -0400
Cc: "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <1533351811.185448.1758718605121.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1533351811.185448.1758718605121@mail.yahoo.com>
--===============8642627045647597021==

--0000000000008a1157063f8bd392
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Bob,
        I haven't used them, but Rimmer's is carrying a poly engine mount
now.  The TRF HD mounts were the best for sure, but this might be another
decent option.

https://rimmerbros.com/Item--i-UKC8330POLY


Jason Sukey
JS Performance Motoring, LLC
440.984.7720
jason@jsperformancemotoring.com
www.jspmparts.com
https://www.facebook.com/JSPerformanceMotoring/


On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 9:06=E2=80=AFAM Robert Lang via Fot <fot@autox.team=
.net>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> After I got my frame straightened last year, I've noticed that the
> clearance between the ATI harmonic dampener and the front cross member an=
d
> the steering rack seems tighter than what I previously had. Granted how
> much metal had been bent in the crash, I'm not surprised.
>
> So, I have a question for the hive - to compensate, I plan to push the
> engine back a tad, maybe 1/4" or so using the "usual method" of installin=
g
> a metal plate in the engine mount to frame interface. The question: in
> moving the engine back in small increments, will I have to "shorten" the
> driveshaft or is the driveshaft length (stock driveshaft and stock 4-spee=
d
> TR6 transmission) already able to compensate for moving the engine back.
>
> I'm not planning to go wild and make the car "mid-engined". I'm just
> looking to compensate for some "rearranged metal" in the front of the car=
.
> That and I also had to switch back to "stock" rubber motor mounts as
> opposed to the HD units that TRF used to sell. Else, if there's a source
> for stiffer stock-type TR6 engine mounts, I'm all ears. The softer stock
> units allow a LOT of motion in both axis of motion.
>
> After two broken cranks this season and reviewing my in-car vids, it look=
s
> like I'm not abusing the self-imposed redline of 6000 except occasional
> hell-toe blips on downshifts (Hi Christian!!) that I need to smooth out.
> But I think the crank is hitting the frame while spinning and that's addi=
ng
> more stress to the snout of the crank.
>
> TIA
>
> Bob Lang
> 339 927 4489
> _______________________________________________
> fot@autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
> Unsubscribe/Manage <http://www.team.net/pipermail/fotUnsubscribe/Manage>:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jason@jsperformancemotoring.com
>
>
>

--0000000000008a1157063f8bd392
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi Bob,</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I haven=
&#39;t used them, but Rimmer&#39;s is carrying a poly engine mount now.=C2=
=A0 The TRF HD mounts were the best for sure, but this might be another dec=
ent option.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"https://rimmerbros.com/Item=
--i-UKC8330POLY">https://rimmerbros.com/Item--i-UKC8330POLY</a></div><div><=
br></div><div><br></div><div><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" dat=
a-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div=
><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Jason Sukey</div><=
div><span></span><span></span>JS Performance Motoring, LLC<br></div><div>44=
0.984.7720</div><div><a href=3D"mailto:jason@jsperformancemotoring.com"; tar=
get=3D"_blank">jason@jsperformancemotoring.com</a><br></div><div><a href=3D=
"http://www.jspmparts.com"; target=3D"_blank">www.jspmparts.com</a></div><di=
v><a href=3D"https://www.facebook.com/JSPerformanceMotoring/"; target=3D"_bl=
ank">https://www.facebook.com/JSPerformanceMotoring/</a><br></div></div></d=
iv></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class=3D"gm=
ail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On W=
ed, Sep 24, 2025 at 9:06=E2=80=AFAM Robert Lang via Fot &lt;<a href=3D"mail=
to:fot@autox.team.net">fot@autox.team.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px =
solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style=3D"font-family:&qu=
ot;Helvetica Neue&quot;,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div dir=
=3D"ltr">Hi,</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">After I got m=
y frame straightened last year, I&#39;ve noticed that the clearance between=
 the ATI harmonic dampener and the front cross member and the steering rack=
 seems tighter than what I previously had. Granted how much metal had been =
bent in the crash, I&#39;m not surprised.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><=
div dir=3D"ltr">So, I have a question for the hive - to compensate, I plan =
to push the engine back a tad, maybe 1/4&quot; or so using the &quot;usual =
method&quot; of installing a metal plate in the engine mount to frame inter=
face. The question: in moving the engine back in small increments, will I h=
ave to &quot;shorten&quot; the driveshaft or is the driveshaft length (stoc=
k driveshaft and stock 4-speed TR6 transmission) already able to compensate=
 for moving the engine back.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"lt=
r">I&#39;m not planning to go wild and make the car &quot;mid-engined&quot;=
. I&#39;m just looking to compensate for some &quot;rearranged metal&quot; =
in the front of the car. That and I also had to switch back to &quot;stock&=
quot; rubber motor mounts as opposed to the HD units that TRF used to sell.=
 Else, if there&#39;s a source for stiffer stock-type TR6 engine mounts, I&=
#39;m all ears. The softer stock units allow a LOT of motion in both axis o=
f motion.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">After two broken=
 cranks this season and reviewing my in-car vids, it looks like I&#39;m not=
 abusing the self-imposed redline of 6000 except occasional hell-toe blips =
on downshifts (Hi Christian!!) that I need to smooth out. But I think the c=
rank is hitting the frame while spinning and that&#39;s adding more stress =
to the snout of the crank.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>TIA</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Bob Lang</div><div di=
r=3D"ltr">339 927 4489</div></div></div>___________________________________=
____________<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:fot@autox.team.net"; target=3D"_blank">fot@autox.team.net<=
/a><br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.fot-racing.com"; rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">=
http://www.fot-racing.com</a><br>
<br>
et=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
Archive: <a href=3D"http://autox.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://autox.team.net/archive</a> <a href=3D"http://www.team.n=
et/pipermail/fotUnsubscribe/Manage" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tp://www.team.net/pipermail/fot<br>
t/jason@jsperformancemotoring.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">htt=
p://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jason@jsperformancemotoring.com</a><=
br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000008a1157063f8bd392--

--===============8642627045647597021==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot



--===============8642627045647597021==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>