healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Longbridge MG Rover plant.

To: davidwjones <davidwjones@cox.net>, dwflagg@juno.com, wilko2@cox.net
Subject: Re: Longbridge MG Rover plant.
From: healeyolic <healey6@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:48:01 -0400
Don't forget, that is exactly what they did with the original T-Bird --  
underpowered, too wide and too soft of a suspension. Trying to compete with 
the newly issued Corvette and all of the LBC's made them think that there 
was no market for an American sports car and they changed it into an 
overblown boat instead of  tweaking it to compete. They did the same thing 
with the Mustang and over the years have done their best to kill it off 
also.

John Sims, BN6
Aberdeen, NJ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>
To: <dwflagg@juno.com>; <wilko2@cox.net>
Cc: <david@bighealey.ltd.uk>; <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Longbridge MG Rover plant.


> That, and the tag was about $10,000 too high.
> Dave J,
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: dwflagg@juno.com
>  To: wilko2@cox.net
>  Cc: david@bighealey.ltd.uk ; healeys@autox.team.net
>  Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:15 PM
>  Subject: Re: Longbridge MG Rover plant.
>
>
>  That and the fact that the design wasn't even close. A hot
>  engine would not have made much of a difference. Too many gadgets
>  and not enough car!!
>
>  Doug
>
>
>
>  Well,
>  It's not only the UK who has lame business managers.
>
>  Ford is closing the famous plant that has most recently been building
>  the retro looking T Bird. That plant will close in July and thousands
>  will lose their jobs.
>
>  This one is a combination of the business managers and the engineers
>  (maybe with business pressure) to not put a decent engine in the car to
>  make it a "true T Bird" that woul d actually sell and compete with
>  other cars in it's class...




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>