healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Camber

To: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>, <healeys@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Camber
From: "Chris Dimmock" <cd3000@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 07:48:15 +1000
You probably have the wrong front shocks fitted Greg. Or the wrong 
wishbones.

>>the top of the fronts stick out maybe an inch to 1.5" more than the 
>>bottoms.

Measure the top arm (the shock arm). Assuming the chassis hasn't been 
changed - the top arm should be around 216mm - 218 mm centre to centre on a 
std car with 1 degree positive camber.

There are other shock arms off other sedans - down to around 198mm. Using 
these shorter arms on a Healey can reduce the 1 degree positive camber down 
to over 2 degrees negative camber.

I've never researched longer top arms - but I'm sure they exist.

http://www.myaustinhealey.com/austin_healey_technical_articles.html

Best

Chris




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>

Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:34 AM
Subject: Camber


> After scratching my head and guessing that the outside wear on my front 
> tires
> was due to incorrect toe-in I recently bought new tires and rather than 
> wear
> these out wanted to fix the problem.
>
> It turns out, based upon my level, that I have some pretty significant
> positive camber on the fronts, i.e. the top of the fronts stick out maybe 
> an
> inch to 1.5" more than the bottoms.
>
> Is this a common problem with older Healeys? the front suspension is 
> recently
> rebuilt, nothing seems bent and there is no sign of accident damage.
>
> My first thought was to fix with offset bushes, I asked Dennis Welch about 
> how
> many degrees they could correct for with their offset bushes and just got 
> a
> nebulous answer.  By eyeballing I don't think there would be enough 
> adjustment
> in their bushings to fix my problem.
>
> Any thought on a fix short of re-engineering the front suspension?
>
> Greg Lemon
> 54 BN1




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>