healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Valve job\Oils....

To: "Bob Brown" <BlkBt7@aol.com>, "Dave & M" <rusd@sitestar.net>,
Subject: Re: Valve job\Oils....
From: "Tom Felts" <tomfelts@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:02:14 -0400
This site shows it does contain it.  (VR1)--unless Val stopped adding it
after this info was posted.

http://www.lnengineering.com/oil.html


> [Original Message]
> From: Bob Brown <BlkBt7@aol.com>
> To: Dave & M <rusd@sitestar.net>; Healeys <healeys@autox.team.net>
> Date: 5/12/2007 7:11:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Valve job\Oils....
>
> I hadn't been paying close attention to the details of this thread, but
> realizing I have a rebuilt BJ8 engine in the garage with new tappets I
> thought I should try to catch up. However, I'm getting confused.
>
> I have a Valoline VR-1 (VV211) Exceeds API Services SM/SL/CD
> and it reads ".. anti-wear additives and ZDDP provide ultimate wear
> protection."
>
> Dave stated SM (VV211) did not contain ZDDP, who really knows what
> contains what.
>
> Bob
>
> Dave & M wrote on 5/12/2007, 5:46 PM:
>
>
>  >
>  > I think the change was fairly recent.  The SM spec goes into effect in
>  > 2007. Note that I previously said SL when I meant SM. My older VR1 oil
>  > containers for oil rated API service SL stated contains ZDDP. Does
>  > your "good" oil show for API service SM or just SL?
>  >
>  > I doubt if you will find the ZDDP content given in any of Valvolines
>  > most recent literature.
>  >
>
>  >
>  > >>  To: Tom Felts <tomfelts@earthlink.net>
>  > >>
>  > >> Valvoline VR1 used to be one of the good guys.
>  > >>
>  > >> The latest batch of VR1, Valvoline Racing 20W-50, part # VV211,
>  > >> that I have, is clearly marked for API services SM, SL, CD. The
>  > >> newer API rated SL oils, by definition, must contain less or no
>  > >> ZDDP. You will note that  none of the most current oil analysis'
>  > >> for VR1 mention the ZDDP content any more. It used to be clearly
>  > >> listed in the MSDS.
>
es!




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>