It doesn't surprise me that you chose not to share you're trivialisation of the
U.S. Constitution with the list.
It's a standard to the World. Our leaders are sworn to uphold it.
As far as Jefferson and FDR are concerned - nobody's perfect.
I have no problem tweeking it as long as it results in more freedom not less
freedom. Thats what it's all about Alan,
F R E E D O M
(and freedom to drive your Healey at night and in the rain or snow if you
should so choose)
Best
JK
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Alan Seigrist <healey.nut@gmail.com>
> Subject: Jackson Krall
> To: jackson_krall@yahoo.com
> Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 12:41 AM
> Jackson -
>
> The dismantling of the constitution is ongoing by both the
> left and
> right, note the following article.
>
> By the way, our founding fathers never expected the
> Constitution to be
> such a rigid document, in fact T. Jefferson, the most
> liberal of our
> foundoing fathers, often argued that the entire system of
> goverment
> should dispensed with and re done with each generation.
> Now that's
> revolutionary - what is happening today can only be called
> "revolutionary" by propagandists and
> reactionaries, and is no
> different than what FDR instituted during the depression
> and the war.
> In fact, most of the legal framework of what the current
> administration is doing is based on strong precedents set
> by the FDR
> government - the greatest Democrat of the last century.
>
> Alan
>
>
> Hate speech or free speech? What much of West bans is
> protected in U.S.
> By Adam Liptak
>
> Wednesday, June 11, 2008
>(article deleted)
>
> --
> Alan
>
> '52 A90
> '53 BN1
> '64 BJ8
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|