Here is the cover article, and it talks allot about ethanol, where is
the A/C discussion?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725975,00.html
BTW after the 31% increase in my per kW rate between April and May's
bill I switch power providers to a 100% renewable power plan with
another company. We do have a gas guzzling SUV, it is flex fuel
ready, so if the promises of Cellulosic ethanol come through I will be
able to use that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulosic_ethanol
Right now I find it funny that E85 is moving up a steady $.30 less
than regular unleaded at my local station. You would think if this
business model on E85 was sound, that the rapidly increasing gasoline
costs would only effect the 15% of the fuel that is petroleum based
plus costs of transit and production.
Patton
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Richard Gordon
<HealeyHundred@comcast.net> wrote:
> Have you got a cite from somewhere other than a crackpot site that
> back up
> this accusation that R-134 is worse for the environment than R-12?
> I'm in
> the industry,and I have never heard that.
> Rick
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Check Time Magazines April 7th issue, it is the cover story.
>
> Richard
>
--
Patton Dickson - http://Austin-Healeys.com - Plano, TX
1957 Austin-Healey 100-Six "Built to run 'til the road wears out."
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|