healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Temp gauge accuracy

To: "'Mirek Sharp'" <m.g.sharp@sympatico.ca>, "'Healey List'"
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Temp gauge accuracy
From: "Dave Porter" <frogeye@porterscustom.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:17:56 -0600
OK, maybe not everyone, but my best guess is 3 out of 5 tend to read at
least 10-15 degrees high; YRMV. "Old" would be pretty synonymous with any
and all Healey's. 
Dave

frogeye@porterscustom.com

Porter Customs   2909 Arno NE
Albuquerque, NM USA 87107
505-352-1378
1954 BN2  1959 AN5
Porter Custom Bicycles

cars:
 www.britishcarforum.com/portercustoms.html
gallery:
http://picasaweb.google.com/porterscustombicycles/PorterCustomBicyclesStuff

blog: http://porterbikes.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Mirek Sharp
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:59 PM
To: Healey List
Subject: [Healeys] Temp guage accuracy

In a recent post,  Dave Porter wrote: "The old temp gauges are horribly
inaccurate".

I am not sure what Dave means by "old" (just 4 bangers or all Healeys?), and
I
only have experience with one, but when I had my gauge and sending unit out
I
tested it out of curiosity using a laboratory thermometer (highly accurate)
and a pot of water I brought to boiling on the cooktop.

When the gauge read 160 degrees, the temp was actually 159.8, and when it
indicated 190 degrees it was actually 189.

I was impressed!

I am not disputing that in general they may be inaccurate, but mine is great
-
anyone else got any hard data?

cheers,

Mirek
1969 BT7 (and I am sticking to it until my Heritage Certificate is replaced)
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys

You are subscribed as frogeye@porterscustom.com

http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>