healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Fw: CHMSL v 1157s

To: "Dick Matson" <medlabinc@msn.com>, "AustinHealey List"
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Fw: CHMSL v 1157s
From: "Guy R Day" <grday@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:18:34 +0100
<snip> Why ?  <snip>

Because they are instrumental in assisting road safety.
Guy R Day

----- Original Message ----- 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 3:23 AM
Subject: [Healeys] Fw: CHMSL v 1157s


> Well, a third brake light effort on our old cars is time and money spent 
> not
> driving.  And then again lot's of production cars have them now.  Why ?
>
> Dick Matson
> Cashmere, WA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 7:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Healeys] CHMSL v 1157s
>
> All agree?? No, I don't agree. 1157's in the stock location have worked
> for me since 1968. None of my collisions have been rear enders. I think
> this third brake light and mechanical brake pedal switch effort is time
> and money spent not driving.
> Ken Freese
> 65 BJ8
>
 > ----- Original Message -----
>Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 6:10 PM
> Subject: [Healeys] CHMSL v 1157s
>
> I think we all agree that the standard stop lights on a Healey are an
> invitation to a rear end collision.  I'm of the opinion that no matter
> how good a bulb you have in the standard location, that there are just
> too many SUVs, etc that won't see it when you hit the brakes.  I'm
> working on using this mounted on the shroud above the trunk
> http://tinyurl.com/yyc3ypk<http://tinyurl.com/yyc3ypk> that will give me a
> combo brake light/ turn
> signal/ running light in the following driver's view.  I'll post up a
> link when I'm done.
> _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>