land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Blower ratio

To: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Subject: RE: Blower ratio
From: jkamo@rushmore.com
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:04:53 -0600
Dave come man.......its the uniting of 
retro and f'n bling...........the merging
of old and new........

piss on it....not into either.........

I am with ya dave....

if it doesnt make it faster...or safer...dont bother...

ya cant sacrifice fast for cool.....when cool is fast....

yet..doing what ya can with what ya got is better than
doing nothing with what ya dont have.........

Joe 


Quoting Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>:

> For me the bitch'n car is the fastest one..LOL
> They usually sound the best as well.
> But if styl'n is what you are after well a different story there.
> I think that disease is referred to as 'chromatosis'..
> As far as sounds go did ya hear the Cosworth F1 motor in qualifying the
> other day.. They are up to 20k rpm..
> Dave
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: dan warner [mailto:dwarner230@yahoo.com]
>   Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:08 AM
>   To: Dave Dahlgren; atrav; LSR list
>   Subject: RE: Blower ratio
> 
> 
>   A valid point Dave.
> 
>   However, the major deal as Keith mentioned is the sound and they look
> bitchn'.
> 
>   Smaller on top is always better,
> 
>   DW
> 
>   Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net> wrote:
>     Why a supercharger with all the parasitic losses? and not a turbo??
>     Dave..
> 
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net
>     > [mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of atrav
>     > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 11:07 PM
>     > To: LSR list
>     > Subject: Blower ratio
>     >
>     >
>     > What is the process to determine the pulley ratio to run with a
>     > regular roots type blower?
>     >
>     > Suppose a 1000cc engine, a blower that claims 600cc of air will
>     > be passed per revolution, and say
>     > somewhere between 5 to 10psi for the pressure is the goal (under
>     > 6K max engine RPM if that matters).
>     > Would a simple 2:1 ratio be a good place to start?
>     > TIA,
>     > -Aron-
>     "Certainly, there is great wisdom behind the rulebook's
> recommendation..." ron 07/14/05
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore.com




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>