mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

stupid timing question

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: stupid timing question
From: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 10:51:12 -0400
Fellow fiends:

Please settle these issues:  I'm having a 'discussion' with a member of my 
local car guy support group on timing the venerable B-series engine.  Please 
tell me if the following statements are true or false:

Statement #1:  "Don't bother dynamically tuning the B-series engine.  Just 
static tune it at 10 BTDC and you'll be fine.  Leave me alone!"

Statement #2:  "The vacuum advance on the B-series doesn't really matter.  
You can drive the car with perfectly good performance with out the vacuum 
advance working at all.  Now push off!"

Statement #2.5:  "Don't worry about the centrifugal advance springs in your 
distributor.  You're just imagining you're losing power at high rpms.  Its a 
B, for chrissake (!), you don't have power at any rpms anyway!  Enjoy the 
car and stop bothering me."  (editor's note: my friend is a bit of a snot 
when it comes to MGs).  

Statement #3:  "Your car is too far advanced if its at 15+ BTDC at 1200 RPM. 
 Like I say, just static tune it and stop bothering me."

Statement #4:  "Don't even think of enhancing performance in the B-series 
with a bunch of tricks like a hot cam or gas porting.  The thing's a lump, 
always has been, always will be.  Be happy with what you have and don't get 
fancy.  Now beat it!"

Really, this guy is a good friend, but he does get testy once in a while.  
Anyway, I'm already appreciating any polite comments you-all might have.  
Where is the high priestess when you need her?

Will "some of my friends are nice" Zehring


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>