>Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:58:44 -0500
>To:mgs-owner@autox.team.net
>From:dresden@star.net
>Subject:Re: MGC Motors, Part II
>
>>X-From_: mgs-owner@autox.team.net Tue Sep 16 02:20:49 1997
>>X-Delivered: at request of bin on venus
>>Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 02:23:47 -0400
>>From: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
>>Organization: BRIT Inc
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>To: Nory <Nory@webtv.net>
>>CC: mgs@autox.team.net
>>Subject: Re: MGC Motors, Part II
>>Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
>>Precedence: bulk
>>Reply-To: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
>>
>>Nory wrote:
>>>
>>> TREVOR WROTE:
>>> "Classic f'in useless post, there, Nory"
>>>
>>> IS THIS BETTER, TREVOR??!!
>>
>> I wrote the email PRIVATELY to save the list from
>>this stuff. It is your reply and therefore your
>>decision to make this public.
>>
>> Anyways, this was your email: "Bob, Atta Boy!"
>>
>> First of all, no content anyways, but that's an
>>old point that has been beaten to death.
>>
>> But no quoting, nothing. No idea what you are saying
>>"Atta boy" about, only a vague idea that it is possibly
>>directed at one of the list members named Bob. Which
>>means perhaps one person on the list will actually even
>>know what you are talking about.
>>
>> Four hundred have to read and delete it, ten guys
>>named Bob will say "is he talking to me", and the real
>>Bob we'll say "What were we talking about again?".
>>
>> In essence a completely useless post.
>>
>> Of course, now you've decided to post your reply in
>>public because you want to create a useless THREAD about
>>your useless post.
>>
>> Some people know no limits.
>>
>>--
>>Trevor Boicey
>>Ottawa, Canada
>>tboicey@brit.ca
>>http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/
>
>
>Yes, that's right, some people seem to know no limits, but I'm sure that
>you, Trevor, because you know how the world works, have long been used to
>this fact of life. As far as useless threads go, it seems to me that a lot
>of useless verbiage has been created by your insistence on having the last
>(usually snide) word. Is private email really to "spare" other people from
>reading it, or is it because you don't want everyone on the list to see
>your nasty side?
>
>So let's have a long and useless thread on this...
>
>Nevin
>>
>
|