mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How Triumph lost their underwear and got a "wedgie"

To: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>
Subject: Re: How Triumph lost their underwear and got a "wedgie"
From: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (John McEwen)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 20:38:22 -0500
Hi Michael:

When you are reminiscing about bad cars from BL, you might remember the
Rover 2000.  I owned a new 2000 TC in 1966.  I believe it rated as slightly
worse or perhaps  very slightly better than the TR7 in terms of major
problem areas as identified by Road and Track.  In any event, they were
both abominable and certainly contributed to the rapid decline and ultimate
failure to the British automobile industry.

All is not lost however, as one of our fellow listees has just announced
that he has acquired a Renault Dauphine.  These cars make TR7 durability
and reliability look positively wonderful.  The very worst car I ever owned
was a Renault Caravelle.

John McEwen




>At 12:00 PM 11/28/97 -0700, you wrote:
>>I think what was being pointed out Re:  TR-7, shape of
>>things to come was:  X1/9, Fiero, MR2, loads of things
>>with prancing horses on 'em...
>
>Sorry, X1/9 (among others) predates tr-7
>
>> My TR-7 survived the rain soaked days of
>>Arkansas far better than anything I've got from
>>Abingdon.  The heads fail?  Try getting more HP out
>>a B-series engine and you can practically hear
>>the head cracking.  The gearboxes were weak?  And
>>that wonder in the A-series Midget was the best
>>thing to ever grace a sports car (not!).  A lot
>>of those old sports cars had a lot of problems.
>>There are ways to fix 'em on a TR-7 as well
>>as an MG.  Of course the '8 was a better car, but
>>then the thing was designed for that engine.
>>If more '8s had been built, or the standard
>>TR-7 had the sprint engine, I think things
>>might have been different.
>
>First off, the TR-7 should've been superior to those cars, given a decade of
>car development. Each of the other cars had some of the problems you list,
>but the TR-7 had them ALL. Beside, it is a simple fact that the TR-7 had
>more warranty claims against it than any other BL product excepting the
>AAauto. That is no marque bias but simple fact. And the poor ol' crippled B
>continued to out sell it!
> And it was UGLY, at least until the advent of the convertible, which
>helped. And others have pointed out that you could round this, stretch that
>and it would be good looking and yadda yadda -- but they DIDN'T round this
>or stretch that!
> Some people love 'em, however. Of course, some people think the Brady Bunch
>was great TV -- must be the plaid.
>
>Michael, New Bern, NC



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>