mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Worst GM engine (no lbc)

To: dmeadow@juno.com
Subject: Re: Worst GM engine (no lbc)
From: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison)
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 20:47:44 EST
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998 07:10:41 -0600 dmeadow@juno.com writes:
>

I'll have to nominate the 4.1L aluminum Cadillac engine. 
 If it overheated (which it was prone to do) it would blow the intake
gasket at the water port, allow water to wash down the "valley", across
the camshaft. Of course this took the lubrication with it, so the cam was
trying to run dry. Meanwhile, the crankcase was filling up with a mix of
oil, water and anti-freeze. All the above with no sign of external leaks.
 
  When I worked at the local Caddy dealer, we had one mechanic who could
change the cam in a 4.1 cad. in less than half the time the flat rate
book called far.  Of course, it was because he probably replaced more of
them than the average factory worker installed!
Rick Morrison
72 MGBGT
74 Midget
>
>BTW, if you are going to name the worst GM Engine, the 4-6-8 V8 fitted 
>into some late 70's (?) Cadillac Sevilles has got to be a candidate.  
>It was called the 4-6-8 because, depending upon engine load, it would 
>only operate on 4 or 6 cylinders (as on a highway, for example).  The 
>idea was to save fuel.  The engine was horribly unreliable, however, 
>and was quickly discontinued.
>
>David Littlefield
>Houston, TX
>David Littlefield
>Houston, TX

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>