mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 25D4 vs 45D4

To: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Subject: Re: 25D4 vs 45D4
From: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 20:50:20 -0800
Hi Paul,

   Thanks for the response.  By 'should' I mean for better performance and
driveability.  If I were going 'by the book' I'd be hunting up a Z-S, etc.  The
car came with the HS4's, a rather worn 25D4 and a (now defunct) exhaust system.
Thanks again.

Bud Krueger

Paul Hunt wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
> To: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>
> Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
> Date: 26 November 1998 19:55
> Subject: Re: 25D4 vs 45D4
>
> >Bud Krueger wrote:
> >>
> >> A bit of advice, please.  My '77MGB has HS4's and an early twin downpipe
> exhaust
> >> system (once I get around to installing it).  I will be using a Pertronix
> >> ignition system.  My problem is this:  I have a 25D4 and a 45D4 available
> to
> >> me.  Which one should I use?  Why? TIA.
> >
> >Depends what you mean by 'should'.  If you mean 'by the book' then
> >probably the 45D4.  However, almost every change to the carburation and
> >ignition systems on the B throughout its life were emissions related,
> >each change reducing performance to varying degrees.  Therefore the 25D4
> >will probably give performance closer to the original, but the
> >carburation, combustion and exhaust characteristics of your particular
> >car will all have a bearing on how successful the substitution will be.
> >
> >PaulH.
> >
> >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>