mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: MG safety questions

To: dresden@tiac.net, mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Fwd: MG safety questions
From: Mgbbob@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:12:55 EST
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--part0_922626775_boundary
Content-ID: <0_922626775@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>

In a message dated 99-03-25 22:05:14 EST, dresden@tiac.net writes:

<< How about to keep your chest from breaking the steering wheel, or to keep
 the passenger's head from damaging the dash?
 
You drive that fast, Nevin? You DO have a point though.
The only accident I ever got in with our 'B' (besides the rear-ender), was a
T-bone to the passenger's side door with my wife in the seat. The only thing
that saved us from personal injury was a quick-thinking avoidance manuever
that put me on the sidewalk.
IMHO, If you see it coming you can avoid it or minimize the damage......no
need to break the steering wheel. 

  My own humble(?) opinion is that the move from two to three point belts was
 probably the single best thing to happen to automotive crash safety, better
 than air bags, even.

Sure, they're better than lap belts.......but, admit it, in a serious accident
(over 70 mph) we're goners anyway. 
My '66 has no head restraints and no roll bar.    

Bob Stahlbush
66 MGB GHN 3L 78708
60 TR3A TS 81398 L  
  >>


--part0_922626775_boundary
Content-ID: <0_922626775@inet_out.mail.tiac.net.2>
Content-disposition: inline

Return-Path: <mgs-owner@autox.team.net>
Received: from  rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (rly-zc02.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.2]) by
        air-zc03.mail.aol.com (v58.16) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:05:13
        -0500
Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu (triumph.cs.utah.edu [155.99.188.52])
          by rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
          with ESMTP id WAA07040;
          Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:05:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
        by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA19446;
        Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:05:00 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA19316
        for mgs-actors; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:02:23 -0700 (MST)
From: dresden@tiac.net
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:02:12 GMT
Message-Id: <v01530500b320626380d2@[207.60.68.227]>
To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: MG safety questions          
        boundary="part0_922415380_boundary"
Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dresden@tiac.net
Mime-Version: 1.0

>It doesn't make any sense to install 3-point belts without installing a roll
>bar......and I hate the looks of the car with it. In our car they're nothing
>more than a placebo (?).

How about to keep your chest from breaking the steering wheel, or to keep
the passenger's head from damaging the dash?

Those Nova crash films sure were more effective than the ones from the
1950's I saw in driver's ed. (No, I'm not that old, but the films were). My
own humble(?) opinion is that the move from two to three point belts was
probably the single best thing to happen to automotive crash safety, better
than air bags, even. (That's a joke, call me a dinosaur, but I've never
owned a car with airbags; I suspect they are named after their inventors).

Nevin



--part0_922626775_boundary--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>