mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: MGB Tube Shocks

To: "Eric" <eric@erickson.on.net>, <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: MGB Tube Shocks
From: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:46:43 -0600
50, race, no tube shocks.

Larry Hoy

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
>Behalf Of Eric
>Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 2:49 AM
>To: mgs@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: MGB Tube Shocks
>
>
>WSpohn4@aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> In a message dated 10/06/00 6:08:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>> barrier@bconnex.net writes:
>> 
>> > I am a bit puzzled about tube shocks.  If they are no better than 
>> > the old Armstrongs why do the hot boy racers of MGs, who are after 
>> > performance including road holding, prefer them?  
>> 
>> I have no idea who you are talking about.
>> Everyone that I know that actually races an MG uses Armstrongs.
>> 
>
>OK, so I turn 41 in a few months... you don't have to rub it in!
>
>I 'race' my 'B for fun (not profit!!!!!) but we are pretty darn
>competitive, and I haven't seen the need to go the tube shock path.
>
>
>Eric
>'68MGB MkII

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>