mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is the 1965 MGB the best year made?

To: "Max Heim" <mvheim@studiolimage.com>, "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Is the 1965 MGB the best year made?
From: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:48:28 -0600 (MDT)
Nice looking '77  (You can see the year in the paper on the
windshield.)
http://lundgren.denver.co.us/Conclave/2001/P9160218.JPG

How many horses were lost when they went to the low compression
engines?

On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:33:42 -0700, Max Heim wrote:

>Personally, I find the combination of rubber bumpers, "highboy" ride,
>plastic-y interiors, and detuned, single carb engines to be a major
>deterrent to considering an RB car. But I know many enjoy them, and they
>have the advantage of being as much as 18 years newer. And still offer top
>down motoring enjoyment, of course.

--
Andrew Lundgren
lundgren@byu.net
http://www.itwest.net/~lundgren

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>