For those of you thinking about this exchange, why don't you ask the
question,
How many who exchanged the ZS for a Weber then changed again to the SU
set-up and
How many who exchanged the ZS for SU's then changed again to a Weber set-up?
This might help decide.
Bill
'76B with SU's
At 09:38 AM 3/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>The weber looks like it is relatively simple to install, while the SU
>seems to be more complex. But I think people here have had better
>drivability with the dual SU's. Once they're set up, they don't need
>much fooling.
>
>Personally, I'm trying to make that decision as well. I was first
>leaning towards a Weber and a Peco exhaust manifold, then a SU setup and
>Peco manifold, and now I'm leaning back towards the Weber. It may end up
>being whatever I can get for the least amount of money.
>
>Of course if I can find an older B (pre-76) in as decent shape as this
>79 I am looking at, at around the same price, I'd rather get that one.
>
>Ben Ruset
>ben.ruset@verizon.net <-- note the new address
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
>> [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Zubrovka
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:26 AM
>> To: mgs@autox.team.net
>> Subject: intake
>>
>>
>> Ok, now I have a question. One of the items I intend to change on my
>> 76 B is the intake/exhaust. Most of the catalogs I've ever looked at
>> push the webber downdraft carb and intake as "the best way", but I
>> see y'all talking about swapping them out for the dual side draft
>> SU's. So what's the best route?
>> John
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|