mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Oil Pressure Sender/hose

To: "Matt Trebelhorn" <matt.lists@trebelhorn.com>
Subject: Re: Oil Pressure Sender/hose
From: "Phil Bates" <jello@ida.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:22:37 -0700 (MST)
I'm not 100% sure on this, because I have an early B, and an A - both of
which use the actual oil in that hose as their sending unit, but......the
way the flex hose works, the flare internal to the female threaded part
makes the seal - the threads do not make the seal, it is the flare. 
Similar to AN fittings.  The design with a sender (which I don't have) may
require those fittings to make a seal - which would be why you have the
flexhose.  It may be replaceable with a solid line, but why?? The flex
line is universal to older motors (that ultimately go through a firewall,
and on a gauge), and it allows one the ability to put it in place easily,
since it's flexible.

Phil Bates

> So, on my '70 B, the oil pressure sender and the oil pressure sender
> pipe below are usually covered in a light ooze of oil.
>
> The hose has given up the ghost (gone in short order from ooze to drip
> to spray), so I've ordered a new one.
>
> When I put the new one on, is there anything I can do to try and keep
> the oil inside?  Make sure the threads are clean, obviously; don't
> over-tighten anything.  What sort of threads are they, and is it an
> application where teflon pipe tape is appropriate?  Any other hints?
>
> This strikes me as a slightly odd fitting -- a flexible hose between
> the engine block and something bolted directly to the engine block --
> and I thought about replacing the thing with an aeroquip or other
> high-grade type hose... I decided against it for the time being, since
> I'm still a little unclear as to why the thing uses a flex hose in the
> first place, and I wouldn't want to substitute a part in some way that
> would affect the gauge readings.
>
> Anyway, your thoughts on this piece of plumbing are appreciated.
>
> M.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>