shop-talk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Shop-talk] Two SSRs from one PID controller

To: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com> definitions=2020-10-02_10:2020-10-02, 2020-10-02 signatures=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=640 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2006250000 definitions=main-2010020124
Subject: Re: [Shop-talk] Two SSRs from one PID controller
From: Pat Horne <patintexas@icloud.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:20:44 -0500
Cc: Lee Daniels <lee@automate-it.com>, "shop-talk@autox.team.net" <Shop-talk@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: shop-talk@autox.team.net
References: <CAO8Q7CPBbdnetKNkQZXReFZZh7U0hUeQaw+-Hb4jqjzUeK7a1A@mail.gmail.com>
--===============3328909716981777581==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Apple-Mail-DECD8D57-F36E-4A91-95B3-5EC811CEA9C8
        charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If the problem with running them in parallel is the required current, you ca=
n always add a transistor to up the available current outside the PID.=20

Peace,
Pat

Pat Horne=20
We support Habitat for Humanity


On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:45 AM, Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com> wrote:

=EF=BB=BF
You can drive one off of the regular output, and another relay off of the Al=
arm output.  The alarm wouldn't be fancy controlled, but it's not clear what=
 the application is.

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 7:10 PM <lee@automate-it.com> wrote:
> I want to operate two solid-state relays simultaneously (one for a 110V ci=
rcuit, the other for 220V) from a single PID. I had thought I would just wir=
e them in parallel from the PID, but a bit of poking around the interwebs su=
ggests otherwise. So I sketched up this drawing for two SSRs in series with a=
 PID. Does this look correct for this situation? Any suggestions appreciated=
!
>=20
> (I'm a chemist, so I understand electron flow and related, but I trust thi=
s little Shop Talk community more than I trust my electrical intuition!)
> Thanks!!!
>  Lee
> <0905ec96.png>
> _______________________________________________
>=20
> Shop-talk@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation  $12.96
> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk http://autox.team.net/arc=
hive
>=20
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/shop-talk/fishpl=
ate@gmail.com
>=20
_______________________________________________

Shop-talk@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk http://autox.team.net/archi=
ve

as@icloud.com


--Apple-Mail-DECD8D57-F36E-4A91-95B3-5EC811CEA9C8
        charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto">If the problem with running them in paralle=
l is the required current, you can always add a transistor to up the availab=
le current outside the PID.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Peace,</div><div>Pat<br=
><br><div dir=3D"ltr">Pat Horne&nbsp;<div>We support Habitat for Humanity</d=
iv><div><br></div></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br>On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:45 AM, Jef=
f Scarbrough &lt;fishplate@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr=
">=EF=BB=BF<div dir=3D"ltr">You can drive one off of the regular output, and=
 another relay off of the Alarm output.&nbsp; The alarm wouldn't be fancy co=
ntrolled, but it's not clear what the application is.</div><br><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 7=
:10 PM &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:lee@automate-it.com";>lee@automate-it.com</a>&gt=
; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0=
px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=
=3D"font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif">
<div style=3D"margin:0px;padding:0px;font-family:monospace">I want to operat=
e two solid-state relays simultaneously (one for a 110V circuit, the other f=
or 220V) from a single PID. I had thought I would just wire them in parallel=
 from the PID, but a bit of poking around the interwebs suggests otherwise. S=
o I sketched up this drawing for two SSRs in series with a PID. Does this lo=
ok correct for this situation? Any suggestions appreciated!<br> <br> (I'm a c=
hemist, so I understand electron flow and related, but I trust this little S=
hop Talk community more than I trust my electrical intuition!)<br> Thanks!!!=
<br> &nbsp;Lee</div>
<div style=3D"margin:0px;padding:0px;font-family:monospace"><div>&lt;0905ec9=
6.png&gt;</div></div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Shop-talk@autox.team.net"; target=3D"_blank">Shop-talk@auto=
x.team.net</a><br>
t=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/donate.html</a><br>
Archive: <a href=3D"http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk"; rel=3D"noreferr=
er" target=3D"_blank">http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk</a> <a href=3D=
"http://autox.team.net/archive"; rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://=
autox.team.net/archive</a><br>
<br>
lk/fishplate@gmail.com" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://autox.te=
am.net/mailman/options/shop-talk/fishplate@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span></span=
><br><span>Shop-talk@autox.team.net</span><br><span>Donate: http://www.team.=
net/donate.html</span><br><span>Suggested annual donation &nbsp;$12.96</span=
><br><span>Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk http://autox.tea=
m.net/archive</span><br><span></span><br><span>Unsubscribe/Manage: http://au=
tox.team.net/mailman/options/shop-talk/patintexas@icloud.com</span><br><span=
></span><br></div></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-DECD8D57-F36E-4A91-95B3-5EC811CEA9C8--

--===============3328909716981777581==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

Shop-talk@autox.team.net
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/shop-talk http://autox.team.net/archive



--===============3328909716981777581==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>