spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BMH Body shells

To: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: BMH Body shells
From: James <james.carpenter@ukaea.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:02:09 +0000
Now now we do not wan't to start a war with the MG owners list. 

You might start raceing Midget's a the trafic lights next! 

All you have to mention is 24' turing circle. 

Teliscopic nor leaver arm dampers all round 

No live rear axil, but fully IRS. 

Foot room. 

Wind buffeting. 

Confidence inspiring handeling (Mk Iv / 1500) 

75 BHP 69lbft as aposed to 65 BHP 67lbft for the MKIII's

The fact you can repace the floor without having to gig up the chassis. 

The fact the spridget looked nice when first produced, and then
deteriated with age. 
The fact the Spitfire managed to look nice when new, then get nicer. ;-)

These were all raised in the current clasisc magasine (they had a
comparison between the two)
-- 
James Carpenter
Yellow '79 spit wired by a trained marmot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>