spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: identifying early Spit cranks?

To: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@gte.net>, "Gambony, Jim" <jim.gambony@eds.com>
Subject: Re: identifying early Spit cranks?
From: "James Carpenter" <jc_carpenter@softhome.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 00:03:31 +0100
Block, Con rods and bearings big ends little ends are all the same for the
late 1300's and 1500's.

Head gasguet oil holes are the same (they may be made of different stuff)

It's the didstance between the small end and the top of the piston that
chainges.

Oh and if you put a 1500 9:1 head on a 1300 you get 7.8:1.

The other thing is if you compair two engins in situe and are asked to
identify the crank you are
hard pressed to tell the difference.

Of cource drive the car and the fact you can drive around town and
accelerate from 20 to 30MPH in 4th with out any effort tells you you aint go
the 1300.


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
To: Gambony, Jim <jim.gambony@eds.com>
Cc: spitfires@Autox.Team.Net <spitfires@Autox.Team.Net>
Date: 17 October 1998 02:00
Subject: Re: identifying early Spit cranks?


>Jim,
>Don't get me started on high compression in Spit Engines again.  I still
>have the head that provided the 265 psi compression that caused me to
>break a piston early in the life of Huxley.  Interested in a head that
>has been cud down something like a quarter of an inch?
>
>Joe
>
>Gambony, Jim wrote:
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> If you're willing to tolerate an engine with something like 20:1
>> compression...  yeah, it's a diesel, that's the ticket!
>>
>> Seriously, I thought someone on the list earlier had said that the 1500
used
>> "shorter" pistons... which would make me think the 1300 and 1500 blocks
were
>> the same height.  I have a bunch of 1500s, and someone I know (right
Suz?)
>> has several 1300s of various pedigrees.... I guess I could take this
>> question and run with it (just not carrying a block around, ok).
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Joe Curry [SMTP:spitlist@gte.net]
>> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 1:44 PM
>> > To:   Mark J Bradakis
>> > Cc:   spitfires@autox.team.net
>> > Subject:      Re: identifying early Spit cranks?
>> >
>> > Mark,
>> > So that means that if one were so deviously inclined, he could take a
>> > late 1300 block and fit it with all the innards of a 1500 and have a
>> > cheater engine.  Right?  8^)
>> >
>> > Joe
>> >
>> > Mark J Bradakis wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Oh, and if the crank won't fit your 1500 block, it is obviously not
>> > > a late 1296 crank.  The Mark 4 1296 block is basically the same
casting
>> > > as the 1500, the extra displacement comes from stroking the crank.
>> > >
>> > > mjb.
>> >
>> > --
>> > "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
>> >
>> >   -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
>
>--
>"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
>
>  -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>