That sort of bracket would be best if the holes were horizontal rather
than vertical. It would make for more camber change.
With the process I used, the camber is constantly variable and not in
preset increments. This is because the lower arms themselves are
adjustable liker a turnbuckle.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: James Carruthers [mailto:j.carruthers@rave.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Livia Haasper
Cc: nass@yahoogroups.com; spitfires@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: >>NASS Re: camber question
Liv,
http://www.canleyclassics.com/newproducts.asp?uid=rearwishbonemountingbr
acket
Im sure you could fabricate them yourselves...
James
Livia Haasper wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>has anyone attempted to make the lower control arms on the rear
suspension of
>the GT6 [rotoflex] adjustable to change the camber?..
>What would this do to the rotoflex coupling? We're re-assembling our
GT6 and,
>at the moment, working on the suspension. We're playing with ideas and
would
>like your opinion.
>Cheers Liv
>
>
>
>
>> To unsubscribe send an empty email to:
nass-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> NASS Home Site Full Member nasshq resources http://www.nasshq.org
>> Full Membership details: http://www.nasshq.org/docs/memberapp.html
_____
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nass/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
nass-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:nass-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
|