spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Ignition types and gaps (was: Pertronix, was: 73 MGB)

To: lmyer@probe.net, spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Ignition types and gaps (was: Pertronix, was: 73 MGB)
From: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 08:42:48 EDT
References: <3.0.5.32.19980624195739.007cf9e0@mail.probe.net><3.0.5.32.19980625002225.007a5190@mail.probe.net>
Reply-to: richard.arnold@juno.com (Richard D. Arnold)
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
>The real performance advantage of an electronic distributor is that 
>there is no variation in spark timing coming from variations in point
>lobes - since there are no points.  Is this better than a point
>distributor?  Only if there is something wrong with the point type
>distributor.

My immediate thought is:  Given that all else is equal (I agree with your
argument here), the electronic distributor/ignition is better because
there are fewer parts to wear out, lose adjustment, etc, etc.

>I didn't say that 0.045 was a useful limit.  I was implying that above
>0.045 can cause breakdown of ignition system components and introduce
>certain driveability problems.  I gap mine to the gap the spark plug,
>engine, and ignition system was designed to run at and look elsewhere 
>for gains in performance or driveability.

>The question about "why then did the new cars go to wider gaps (ie 
>0.045)" is a really (really, really) good one.

I gotta go with your theory on this (emissions, et. al. causing leaner
running engines requiring a stronger spark).  Had a '74 Olds Cutlass at
one time with one of the first HEI systems -- plugs were gapped at .080,
but my '78 Chevy half-ton requires a gap of .045.

>Made me go hmmmmm for a while....

What makes me ponder is that the gap on my '79 Midget is supposed to be
set at .025 -- I think that this is the same gap as every other Midget
produced (preceding and through the nastiest of the emmissions years)....
 This one has a electronic ignition, unlike earlier models, but has the
"point type" coil.  Perhaps this is the difference?

My first car was a '66 Chevelle with a 230 CID straight six and a
PowerGlide; points ignition and .035 gap on the plugs.  I read about
indexing plugs and trying different gaps and did this while leaving
everything else the same.  Mileage improved a bit (maybe 2-3 miles to the
gallon) but I don't recall a change in performance (although I doubt I
would have seen noticeable change on a tired six cylinder....).

My conclusion:  I think, then, that one should one use the spark plug gap
as another setting to optimize, right along with heat range, type, etc --
 after all else has been fixed.  Individual driving requirements,
weather, and equipment suggest that this is one variable that, like
jetting a carb, can effect the overall drivability of your car even if
you have optimized everything else.  YMMV.

Les, how about an update on that V6 Spridget of yours?

Rich


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>