I would like to hear from the Judson owners with "proper" installations who
do not report substantial power gains.
Daniel58612
> -----Original Message-----
> From: type79@ix.netcom.com [SMTP:type79@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 1999 3:48 PM
> To: BANJOJOHN@aol.com
> Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: shorrock vs. judson?
>
> John,
> I have never talked with an owner of a car with a shorrock installed, but
> Judson
> owners with proper installations do not report substantial power gains.
> Other
> than for historical curiosity, your time and $ would be better spent on
> other
> engine mods and/or a 1275 engine swap.
>
> Jay Fishbein
>
> BANJOJOHN@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I'm still thinking about a supercharger for my bugeye ( with 1098).
> Does
> > anyone know anything about Shorrock SC as compared with Judson? Does
> anyone
> > have either of these running on their car currently. how is the boost?
> What
> > are the downsides? someone told me it is easy to blow a head gasket
> with a
> > supercharger, especially in the relatively high compression 1098. Any
> > feedback is appreciated.
> >
> > John O'Brien
>
|