'73
----- Original Message -----
From "Brad Fornal" <toyman at digitex.net>
To: "Larry Miller" <millerls@ado13.com>
Cc: <Bkitterer@aol.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: Gulp Valve
> Not to many people are seen these days driving a car that is 26 years old.
What
> is communist Kalifornia's definition of "old"?
>
> Larry Miller wrote:
>
> > Hi Bob
> >
> > A '74 is not considered an old car. I was talking about the visual that
is
> > part of the smog check process. Just passing the tests is not good
enough.
> > All original parts must be present.
> >
> > I sure hope they do not reinstate the roadside checks. I got a ticket
one
> > time for dodging one of them.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Bkitterer@aol.com>
> > To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 11:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: Gulp Valve
> >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 6/11/00 9:55:30 PM, millerls@ado13.com writes:
> > >
> > > << In CA you can't pass the visual inspection without it. >>
> > >
> > > All of our cars that are past the magic age have never been looked at,
> > that
> > > is there is no visual inspection except perhaps when you sell the car.
> > You
> > > are correct that the law for the old cars states that they must pass
> > visual
> > > inspection but as far as we know there are no inspection called for.
> > There
> > > is a lot of debate and discussion going on in Sacramento about road
side
> > > inspections and mobile units to check emissions of vehicles going down
the
> > > highway. Being stopped for one of these, if they come into existence,
are
> > > the only occasions for inspection that come to mind. Do you know of
other
> > > occasions?
> > >
> > > Bob and Annice
> > > 1960 Sprite (Mk IV indiguise)
> > > 1967 Sprite Mk III (in progress)
> > >
>
>
|