spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bypass tube on head

To: <RBHouston@aol.com>, <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: bypass tube on head
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:20:13 -0000charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <9e.773a467.26ae2ce9@aol.com>
rh is correct!  just ask the vintage race guys!  a puller not a pusher as
far as fan location goes!

chuck.
----- Original Message -----
From <RBHouston at aol.com>
To: <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: bypass tube on head


> In a message dated 07/24/2000 2:49:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> grbyrns@ucdavis.edu writes:
>
> << Crossflow rad, no fan on WP, pusher elec
>  thermo fan on front of radiator, thermostatically controlled oil cooler.
>>
> For what it's worth, the TR guys swear the fan should be a puller on the
> engine side of the radiator, or it will cut down on the airflow going
> through.  And believe me, they discussed this down to the molecular
> level...also discussing the need for the proper thermostat, and of course
> special Mercedes water, not distilled, for the radiator.
>
> RH
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>