spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Power to weight ratio

To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Power to weight ratio
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 13:58:42 -0600
References: <110.a76ab1e.295385f2@aol.com> <3C223208.72E8FBFE@clubrx.org>
Got it.
Isn't reasonable, then, to suspect that dollars spent per horsepower gain 
might be better allocated to a health club?
         Food for thought, and probably fodder for an argument;-)

         Y'all have a happy holiday.     Peter C
=====
At 01:27 PM 12/20/2001, David N Waldmann wrote:
>I think you're confused.
>
>Power to weight ratio can and will be anything, as you showed in your
>example.
>
>What was being asked/suggested is a formula or statement that says "for
>every ____ pounds removed or added it is the equivilent of 1 HP" (actually
>should be lb/ft, as the "midget racer" expressed).
>
>HP is what determines your speed, because HP is an expression of
>time/distance work. It makes no difference how heavy your car is if you are
>trying to make it go 120 MPH (well, actually you do increase the rolling
>resistance very slightly), the only forces you have to overcome are wind
>resistance and rolling resistance.
>
>However, Torque, expressed as lbs/ft, describes a weight/distance work, and
>will therefore determine how _long_ it will take you to get to 120 MPH, or
>how fast you can go up a hill (adding the overcoming of gravity to the
>wind/rolling resistance force).
>
><dnw>

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>