| To: | "Spridgets" <Spridgets@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:11:08 -0400 |
| References: | <61.26112dba.2aba5242@aol.com> |
Doesn't really matter! You know what kind of attention span we have. One of the Roberts ----- Original Message ----- From <Ankitterer at aol.com> >--what words are we supposed to use now for fine, okay, and > the like?? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Update on Lost 1500 Head, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Technical terminology-- probably not LBC contented, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |