| To: | "Spridget List" <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: impregnated station wagon |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2003 06:45:39 -0600 |
| References: | <6126-3FDCC46A-3797@storefull-3133.bay.webtv.net> <005f01c3c284$607bbee0$8500a8c0@finnland> <003401c3c2a1$2db648f0$0300a8c0@upstairs> <001301c3c2a8$9c056780$8500a8c0@finnland> <3FDD1BD9.7030607@exit109.com> <3FDD9C09.455C8E6A@digitex.net> |
> b. An impregnated station wagon That's my vote. Of course, bear in mind that my GTi can be considered a mini station wagon, my Escort WAS a station wagon, my 87 Duster hatchback could have been considered an abbreviated station wagon... I got nothin against station wagons or shooting brakes or whatever you want to call them. Chrysler made a fortune selling tall station wagons to people in denial by calling them mini vans. The SUV industry is doing the same. Go figure. David Lieb |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What makes a good snow car? 2003 06:03:32 -0600, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dry Sump, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What makes a good snow car? 2003 06:03:32 -0600, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: impregnated station wagon, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |