| To: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Please note - no LBC content - looking for ---* |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:09:30 -0600 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=p7ObIUWAIg+cNhPfivWJYcSdvgh2vk+P6wpZohfVXVhtdEGz72wyrsqPB3wDfotNIFjrnvY1LCcc9oys77IxOfQtPryn6iYrE5EJECyzzxfNkkZYGNXFfX58cQRPDAchJVJzAg7WthsFAveXKgMnRwKm9438Rb1b2i6Rjcg5gPk= |
| References: | <f5.4b885ba3.2f4b97c0@cs.com> <005f01c51854$cc4ac9a0$01fea8c0@domain.invalid> |
Nope, not a real muscle car. It is just a sedan version of the Dodge Magnum. Plenay of power? Sure, but in my view, this is one ugly car. Of course, I really don't care for the styling of ANY of the Chrysler Corp cars right now. The only one that I would even consider owning is the Crossfire. Even then, I'd spend the extra bucks and get the Mercedes version. On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:34:53 -0800, KGB <kgb@frontiernet.net> wrote: > It's true that they are bring back the Challenger name, but on a 4 door > sedan. That is definitely NOT the Challenger that I remember. > > Kate > > -- -- ================================= = Never offend people with style when you = = can offend with substance --- Sam Brown = ================================= |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Jumpy Timing, No Power - Resolved, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Parting with my toys, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Please note - no LBC content - looking for ---*, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Please note - no LBC content - looking for ---*, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |