spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spridgets] 1959 Berkeley SE 492 Roadster

To: spridgets@autox.team.net, corvallis@peoplepc.com
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] 1959 Berkeley SE 492 Roadster
From: uniquelittlecars@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
 
Interesting - wikipedia say they two a two cylinder motor. I never knew they
made one.
 
All of the ones i owned were 3 cylinders. One was a Royal Infield and the
other two had the excelsior motors.
 
The 492 on the car on ebay was the cc of that model excelsior  motor. They ran
a single carb on each cylinder. (Tri-power) The car because of its weight went
very well with this configuration. The green car looks like the last one i
owned. But i know my car is still here in the USA on display. 
 
Vigil       

--- On Tue, 8/5/08, corvallis@peoplepc.com <corvallis@peoplepc.com> wrote:

From: corvallis@peoplepc.com <corvallis@peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] 1959 Berkeley SE 492 Roadster
To: spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 2:59 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_cars



We could also talk about the Turner.   .bill

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_%28car_company%29



============================================================

-----Original Message-----
From: spridgets-bounces+corvallis=peoplepc.com@autox.team.net
[mailto:spridgets-bounces+corvallis=peoplepc.com@autox.team.net] On Behalf
Of Jim Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:26 PM
To: uniquelittlecars@yahoo.com
Cc: spridgets
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] 1959 Berkeley SE 492 Roadster



One of my pals in England had a Berkeley but I thought I remembered it being

a 3 wheeler with a bigger displacement engine...



Cheers!!

Jim
You are subscribed as uniquelittlecars@yahoo.com

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>