tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: inquiry 071699b

To: "'cthompson@rrinc.com'" <cthompson@rrinc.com>,
Subject: RE: inquiry 071699b
From: "Wright, Larry" <larry.wright@usop.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 16:22:08 -0400

Lawrence R. Wright
Purchasing Analyst
Andrews Office Products Div. of USOP
larry.wright@usop.com (new)
Ph. 301.386.7923  Fx. 301.386.5333

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cthompson@rrinc.com [mailto:cthompson@rrinc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 4:21 PM
> To:   'Wright, Larry'; National Corporation (E-mail)
> Subject:      RE: inquiry 071699b
> 
> My official shop manual lists the overall length as 156", not 
> 165".  Either you have dyslexic fingers, or we found our half 
> a foot....
> 
> The manual lists the wheelbase as 86" as you stated...
> 
        > Chris Thompson

        It wouldn't be the first time, Chris, but the magazine
definitely says 165 inches. At least _I'm_ off the hook. :^)
        That still puts the Tiger at a bare 2-3 inches shorter than the
other two cars!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>