tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 351 Windsor Heads

To: twojohnsons@home.com, derekw@zamnet.zm
Subject: Re: 351 Windsor Heads
From: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 07:20:53 -0800
Derek,

Regarding the longer pushrods, these are not a requirement of the 351W 
heads per se but only needed because the valves used with the 351W heads 
had longer stems. If you use the standard length 289 or aftermarket valves 
you can use the standard length push rods, which provides much needed 
clearance in the Tiger installation. While the 351W heads are good, I would 
suggest you seriously consider Edelbrock or TFS aluminum heads. By the time 
you do all the work needed on the 351W heads, the money and effort will 
surpass either of these choices, plus aluminum heads will save a bunch of 
weight. You should run a little more compression with aluminum heads to 
compensate their greater heat conductivity; maybe a full point more 
compression.

Bob

At 08:51 AM 3/24/00 -0500, twojohnsons@home.com wrote:
>Hi Derek,
>Here's my recollection on using 351 heads on a 260,289,or 302. This was done
>because the standard head, even the hi-po was a notorious poor breather,
>snip, snip, snip, . . . .
>I still do have the 16 longer hardened pushrods needed for this swap. They are
>made by Ford motorsports (M-6565-C332) and are no longer listed in their
>catalog.
>Listers, did I forget anything except the 1969 head number?
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>