tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: “Junk Yards”

To: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Subject: Re: “Junk Yards”
From: Steve Laifman <Laifman@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:12:07 -0700
Tigers,

The latest round of good tech-talk on our latest soap -
‘Chris's Crises’ is all valuable advice. There was even some
suggestion of acquiring old parts.

I do believe that we have a nomenclature issue here that
throws a smudge on our acquisition of hard-to-find parts
suitable for our restorations. Calling a valuable source of
supply a “Junk Yard” demeans the source, and the purchaser. We
really need a more up-scale term, commensurate with our
valuable restorations.

For alternates, I suggest a list of options, please feel free
to add your best shot:

1) Previously Owned Parts
2) Restoration Recycled Replacements
3) Veteran Renewal Kits
4) Antiquities Dealers

{9->
-- 
Steve Laifman         < Find out what is most     >
B9472289              < important in your life    >
                      < and don't let it get away!>

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
     _/                 _/_/_/       _/_/_/       _/
    _/        _/      _/     _/     _/    _/     _/_/_/_/
   _/        _/       _/    _/      _/  _/      _/
  _/_/_/_/_/__/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
                            _/
                     _/_/_/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: “Junk Yards”, Steve Laifman <=