It never ceases to amaze me the incredible insight by-standers are able to
offer on events beyond their knowledge base and scope of comprehension.
Full report from the "players"? I don't think you'd know what to do with the
data.
Gotta go practice that "prom queen wave" for showing off my car out on the
track.
Darrell
> Dead Last ["Ray Johnson"
<rnrbj@hotmail.com>]
> Re: Dead Last
[stubrennan@attbi.com]
> Re: Dead Last ["Tim Jordan"
<Tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>]
> RE: Dead Last ["Chris Thompson"
<cthompson@rrinc.com>]
>Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:28:05 +0000
>From: "Ray Johnson" <rnrbj@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Dead Last
>Anybody besides me interpret the Le Mans Revival Tiger results differently
>than bottom of the stack?
>Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 17:08:15 +0000
>From: stubrennan@attbi.com
>Subject: Re: Dead Last
>Despite our fondness for them, the Lister Tigers were
>poorly conceived and poorly developed back then, so how
>much better did you expect them to get over time? At
>least it appears that they managed to operate through
>the entire program, unlike 1964. Most vintage racers
>are more interested in having fun and showing off their
>cars, than in winning trophies.
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:25:22 -0700
>From: "Tim Jordan" <Tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>
>Subject: Re: Dead Last
>
>What a particularly puzzling predicament the Le Mans Tigers have provided
>us. Once again Le Mans has more fangs than the "Coupes" and the results
>show two "Kitties" pawing their way around the course looking for a "box" to
>park in. Historically speaking, it's deja vu all over again.
>
>Of course the Sunbeam Alpine entry performed flawlessly and finished every
>race with over half the pack chasing. Probably could have won the Index of
>Thermal Eff. AGAIN!
>
>Hope we can get a full report from the "players" about the Le Mans
>experience, as well as the other events they attended during September. The
>usual websites are mysteriously quiet after a fantastic pre-race buildup.
>Waiting for the heat to blow over....like in 1964.
>Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:07:53 -0400
>From: "Chris Thompson" <cthompson@rrinc.com>
>Subject: RE: Dead Last
>
>As I read the web page, 1 car did zero laps in each race, the other car did
>four out of seven in the first race, and zero in the others. Am I missing
>something?
|