I agree to the value of TACing a car. How does one do this on the East
Coast? Mine's pulled apart and close to a rotisserie media blasting job.
Tony McNulty
B382001321 (original owner)
----- Original Message -----
From: "rande" <rande@thecia.net>
To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Tigers] D. Barkers comments on TAC
> IMHO, TAC has made a significant contribution to the documentation
> and value of legitimate Tigers. Without it, we probably wouldn't even
> be having this discussion today. Too bad administration of the
> program isn't more aggressive.
>
> I, too, am not currently a TAC inspector, but like Dick, support the TAC
> program.
> As Dick wrote, the sole purpose for inspecting is to determine whether the
> Tiger
> under consideration for a certificate did originally travel down the
> Jensen
> assembly line with the goal of being finished as a Sunbeam Tiger. The TAC
> Committee
> inspects Tigers solely for the owner of the car, and solely by invitation
> by
> the owner. The TAC Committee does not initiate any inspections on their
> own.
> They have to be invited by the car's owner, otherwise the process doesn't
> begin.
> This explains why the the TAC Committee may not seem to be more aggressive
> with
> their inspections, to some folks.
> _______________________________________________
> bamcnulty@optonline.net
>
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
|