tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] jeep trans

To: <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] jeep trans
From: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:26:44 -0700
Clyde,
 You are correct, the Jeep trans ratio in 4th is still 1 to 1.  However, we 
need to consider the third factor in the drivetrain ratios. That being the 
tire circumference. The fact is one should consider RPM per tire rotation so 
the WHOLE driveline system is factored in.  That way you are looking at the 
true final output.
   As I said you get an "equivalent" overdrive IF you used taller tires. 
And with the Jeep trans you could do that because a taller tire would bring 
the 3.01 1st gear on the Jeep trans near the 2.78 1st gear of a wide ratio 
Toploader.
  The inverse is also true. One could run a shorter tire with an overdrive 
T-5 and effectively wipe out the advantage of the overdrive.  Of course this 
taller/shorter tire argument  needs to be based around a standard. In my 
number crunching I use the standard size tire that  originally came on the 
Tiger.

I always found it humorous when friends would say they were going to run 
4:11 gears in their muscle car - with 50 series tires.  Why?  Well, isn't 
that what the drag cars run (they would say)?  I guess they never considered 
how tall a race slick the drag car ran.
Tom


> Hi Gang,  I must be missing something here!!  Where is the OD??  The 
> numbers.
> ratios,  stated still end up 1 to 1 in 4th..Clyde
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>